Here Comes Everybody details disruptions that the
internet era caused in the news industry. Before the rise of amateur
bloggers and social media gurus, the news was first filtered by big agencies and
then published. Now it’s the reverse. The
news goes out via the diverse channels of the World Wide Web and then the filtering
happens second. Should this fundamental shift in the publishing
process change the way we approach the news? As we discussed this question in
class, the following thoughts came to mind. Over the past several hundred years the world has had good reason to be
suspicious of what it reads and hears from the press because it was likely
heavily filtered. With the filtering
plug lifted in our internet era, we still have need for suspicion, but for a very
different reason. We must be suspicious
of what we hear, precisely because it may be unfiltered.
I am more worried about the bias of the news agencies. They can't seem to just tell a story by its facts they have to twist it to promote their own political agenda.
ReplyDeleteI agree that we need to be wary and consider the source. However, I feel that now that more people can share news stories, we can find out about news that we may not have known in the past. This new technology is keeping news stations more honest.
ReplyDelete